Rol for normalization of DENV quantification. The probe for b-actin was FAM-TTCACCACCACGGCCGAGC-TAMRA, forward and reverse primers were ACCGAGCGCGGCTACAG and CTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTCC, respectively(SBS Genetech, Beijing, China).Indirect immunofluorescence and in-cell western immunoassayCells were fixed with PBS containing 2 paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1 triton X-100 PBS. Cells were blocked and then incubated with mouse monoclonal antibody against DENV E protein (1:500 dilution, Clone D1-4G2-4-15, Billerica, EMD Millipore, MA) or rabbit polyclonal anti-BST2 antibody (1:250 dilution, Proteintech, Chicago, IL). Bound primary antibody was visualized by Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or Alesa Fluor 594-conjugated goat MedChemExpress SB-497115GR antirabbit IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (49,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Invitrogen). In-cell western immunoassay was performed as previously described [27]. Primary antibodies were bound with an antimouse IRDye 800CW-labeled secondary antibody (green color) or anti-rabbit IRDye 700CW-labeled secondary antibody (red color). Cell viability was determined by Sapphire 700 staining (Red color). The fluorescence signal intensity was quantified with LICOR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE).Results Expression and localization of BST2 and BST2CV5 in Huh7 cellsHuh7 is a hepatocarcinoma cell line, which is highly permissive for DENV infection [30]. We established Huh7-derived stable cell lines that express wild-type or carboxy-terminally V5 epitopetagged mutant BST2 proteins, designated as Huh7-BST2 and Huh7-BST2CV5, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, expression of BST2 and its variant in the two cell lines were confirmed by indirect immunofluorescent staining and western blot. Consistent with a previous report [26], wild-type BST2 was observed in cells with or without detergent-permeablizing treatment. This suggests that BST2 localizes both in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane. In marked contrast, the C-terminal V5-tagged BST2 protein (BST2CV5) was only observed in the presence of detergentpermeablizing treatment and mostly detected in cytoplasm (Fig. 1.A and C). This suggests that the addition of 14 amino acid residues of V5 eiptope tag at the C-terminus of BST2 alters the 1317923 intracellular trafficking of BST2 that prevents its expression on the cell surface. To evaluate the expression levels of BST2 and its variant in the cell lines, we compared their expression levels with that of parent Huh7 induced by various concentrations of IFN-a. The results showed that the expression of BST2 and BST2CV5 in cell lines were comparable to that of 100?00 U/ml IFN-a induction (Fig. 1.B).Western blotExpression levels of BST2 and its variant in the cell lines were evaluated using western blot by comparing parental Huh7 cells treated with 0 to 3000 IU/ml of IFN-a for 48 h. Whole cell monolayers were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline buffer and lysed with 16sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) Sample Buffer. For cell fractional protein purchase EED226 analysis, membrane and cytosol fractions were separated by centrifugation methods by using of a subcellular protein fractionation kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). A fraction of the cell lysate was separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate 12 SDS polyacrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF, EMD Millipore). The proteins on membrane were bound with indicated antibodies a.Rol for normalization of DENV quantification. The probe for b-actin was FAM-TTCACCACCACGGCCGAGC-TAMRA, forward and reverse primers were ACCGAGCGCGGCTACAG and CTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTCC, respectively(SBS Genetech, Beijing, China).Indirect immunofluorescence and in-cell western immunoassayCells were fixed with PBS containing 2 paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1 triton X-100 PBS. Cells were blocked and then incubated with mouse monoclonal antibody against DENV E protein (1:500 dilution, Clone D1-4G2-4-15, Billerica, EMD Millipore, MA) or rabbit polyclonal anti-BST2 antibody (1:250 dilution, Proteintech, Chicago, IL). Bound primary antibody was visualized by Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or Alesa Fluor 594-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (49,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Invitrogen). In-cell western immunoassay was performed as previously described [27]. Primary antibodies were bound with an antimouse IRDye 800CW-labeled secondary antibody (green color) or anti-rabbit IRDye 700CW-labeled secondary antibody (red color). Cell viability was determined by Sapphire 700 staining (Red color). The fluorescence signal intensity was quantified with LICOR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE).Results Expression and localization of BST2 and BST2CV5 in Huh7 cellsHuh7 is a hepatocarcinoma cell line, which is highly permissive for DENV infection [30]. We established Huh7-derived stable cell lines that express wild-type or carboxy-terminally V5 epitopetagged mutant BST2 proteins, designated as Huh7-BST2 and Huh7-BST2CV5, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, expression of BST2 and its variant in the two cell lines were confirmed by indirect immunofluorescent staining and western blot. Consistent with a previous report [26], wild-type BST2 was observed in cells with or without detergent-permeablizing treatment. This suggests that BST2 localizes both in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane. In marked contrast, the C-terminal V5-tagged BST2 protein (BST2CV5) was only observed in the presence of detergentpermeablizing treatment and mostly detected in cytoplasm (Fig. 1.A and C). This suggests that the addition of 14 amino acid residues of V5 eiptope tag at the C-terminus of BST2 alters the 1317923 intracellular trafficking of BST2 that prevents its expression on the cell surface. To evaluate the expression levels of BST2 and its variant in the cell lines, we compared their expression levels with that of parent Huh7 induced by various concentrations of IFN-a. The results showed that the expression of BST2 and BST2CV5 in cell lines were comparable to that of 100?00 U/ml IFN-a induction (Fig. 1.B).Western blotExpression levels of BST2 and its variant in the cell lines were evaluated using western blot by comparing parental Huh7 cells treated with 0 to 3000 IU/ml of IFN-a for 48 h. Whole cell monolayers were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline buffer and lysed with 16sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) Sample Buffer. For cell fractional protein analysis, membrane and cytosol fractions were separated by centrifugation methods by using of a subcellular protein fractionation kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). A fraction of the cell lysate was separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate 12 SDS polyacrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (PVDF, EMD Millipore). The proteins on membrane were bound with indicated antibodies a.