Operational needs and industrial tasks confirms, exoskeletons are mainly made for one use case and to help the program user in 1 certain application, correspondingly. Secondary activities are normally limited, e.g., the arms are nonetheless pushed up when bending forward in passive shoulder exoskeletons. If made correctly, active systems with predicament recognition have a lot more far-reaching possibilities for adapting their help without the need of hindering secondary activities. Despite the fact that exoskeletons are capable of supporting program customers by their functionality, the morphological structure or operating principle can potentially restrict the suitability (e.g., inertial active exoskeletons following or performing dynamic movements) of exoskeletons, as high-dynamic movements could be hindered (e.g., OR08, OR12, IT06, IT07).–5. Discussion Inside the context of this paper, a seven-phase model for the evaluation of exoskeletons has been developed, operationalized by suggests of a test course, and tested in practice utilizing eight exemplary systems. The validation CC-115 Purity focused on testing the practical applicability from the seven-phase model as well as the suitability with the test course with regard to mapping several industrial application scenarios and achieving various outcomes for distinctive exoskeletons. Accordingly, at this stage on the investigation, the comparability of exoskeletons based onAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,16 ofthe studies performed was of secondary interest. Nevertheless, first recommendations for the targeted and proper use of exoskeleton varieties have been derived. five.1. Seven-Phase Model The seven-phase model together with the test course because the practical core of this system enables an evidence-based evaluation of exoskeletons inside a harmonized but practice-oriented test atmosphere. In this respect, the seven-phase model describes important measures for comprehensively evaluating exoskeletons. It will not solely concentrate on the conduct of the evaluation itself but in addition relevant earlier (setup) and subsequent stages (implication). Accordingly, the evaluation outcomes usually do not purely assess the systems but may also offer significant know-how for various user groups and stakeholders, as the test course aids (future) endusers gain applicable details regarding the appropriate use of exoskeletons. Apart from, the evaluation method and results supply insights for exoskeleton makers considering the fact that program configurations and modes of operation is usually sharpened or created with regard to distinct application scenarios. This could potentially decrease development and engineering charges considering the fact that exoskeletons may be comprehensively evaluated prior to their industrial implementation. Nonetheless, the informative value remains coupled towards the regarded evaluation context. five.two. Test Course As outlined by the test course, the complexity of industrial application scenarios of exoskeletons does not merely demand a uniform setup, but rather a multifunctional configuration of infrastructure relating to reusable, movable, and individually adaptable standardized modules. Hence, the test course will not only allow an evaluation of exoskeletons for selected isolated activities but in addition for interrelated activity profiles. This benefit is achieved by combining industrial tasks and setting them up in unique arrangements. Moreover towards the task-based evaluation of exoskeletons for industrial suitability, tests of operational requirements as a second integral component complement the test course.