Operational specifications and industrial tasks confirms, exoskeletons are mostly developed for 1 use case and to help the system user in 1 precise application, correspondingly. Secondary activities are frequently restricted, e.g., the arms are still pushed up when bending forward in passive shoulder exoskeletons. If created correctly, active systems with circumstance recognition have additional far-reaching possibilities for adapting their help without hindering secondary activities. Despite the fact that exoskeletons are capable of supporting system customers by their functionality, the morphological structure or operating principle can potentially restrict the suitability (e.g., inertial active exoskeletons following or performing dynamic movements) of exoskeletons, as high-dynamic movements might be hindered (e.g., OR08, OR12, IT06, IT07).–5. Discussion In the context of this paper, a seven-phase model for the evaluation of exoskeletons has been designed, operationalized by indicates of a test course, and Metipranolol Adrenergic Receptor tested in (��)-Darifenacin Biological Activity practice employing eight exemplary systems. The validation focused on testing the sensible applicability of the seven-phase model and the suitability from the test course with regard to mapping several industrial application scenarios and reaching various results for distinctive exoskeletons. Accordingly, at this stage of your investigation, the comparability of exoskeletons based onAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,16 ofthe research performed was of secondary interest. Nevertheless, initially suggestions for the targeted and acceptable use of exoskeleton forms have already been derived. five.1. Seven-Phase Model The seven-phase model with all the test course because the practical core of this system enables an evidence-based evaluation of exoskeletons within a harmonized but practice-oriented test environment. Within this respect, the seven-phase model describes important measures for comprehensively evaluating exoskeletons. It does not solely concentrate on the conduct in the evaluation itself but also relevant earlier (setup) and subsequent stages (implication). Accordingly, the evaluation benefits usually do not purely assess the systems but can also deliver important knowledge for various user groups and stakeholders, because the test course aids (future) endusers achieve applicable data regarding the suitable use of exoskeletons. In addition to, the evaluation process and outcomes provide insights for exoskeleton companies considering the fact that system configurations and modes of operation is usually sharpened or made with regard to distinct application scenarios. This could potentially reduce development and engineering expenses since exoskeletons could be comprehensively evaluated prior to their industrial implementation. Nevertheless, the informative worth remains coupled for the thought of evaluation context. 5.2. Test Course In line with the test course, the complexity of industrial application scenarios of exoskeletons does not merely demand a uniform setup, but rather a multifunctional configuration of infrastructure concerning reusable, movable, and individually adaptable standardized modules. Hence, the test course does not only enable an evaluation of exoskeletons for chosen isolated activities but in addition for interrelated activity profiles. This advantage is achieved by combining industrial tasks and setting them up in different arrangements. In addition to the task-based evaluation of exoskeletons for industrial suitability, tests of operational requirements as a second integral aspect complement the test course.