Ation format1. Introduction Within the recent years, the speedy spread of wind farms worldwide as an answer to national commitments has entered into international agreements to tackle international warming, which have focused the focus on the public and academia on challenges connected to nearby damaging impacts, like landscape alterations; the production of noise; electromagnetic interferences; the subtraction of agricultural and natural space; plus the risk of attainable damages to flora and fauna, specially to migratory birds [1]. Even though various sector studies and monitoring activities demonstrated the marginality on the majority of such impacts [7], the landscape degradation of wind farms continues to be considered a limiting factor, specially when wind farms take place in areas with distinctive landscape traits and identity place beliefs [8,9]. On the other hand, in such conditions it is actually valuable to investigate the social acceptance of wind farms [10,11], taking into account not only environmental attitudes but additionally how location identity perceptions can influence preferences and help the achievement of two competing green objectives: the reduction of green gas emission and also the conservation of neighborhood landscapes. The literature suggests the existence of quite a few essential influencers of wind farms’ social acceptance, and warns about troubles in the evaluation of this phenomenon because of complicated interactions, at many different geographical scales, concerning attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of men and women, communities, windPublisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Copyright: 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This short article is an open access short article distributed beneath the terms and conditions of the Inventive Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).Sustainability 2021, 13, 12755. https://doi.org/10.3390/suhttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainabilitySustainability 2021, 13,two ofenergy operators, regulatory regimes, and technologies [12]. Many studies point out that the choice generating procedure need to be accompanied by early political and economic participation [13], communication with residents immediately after the preparing phase [14], possibilities for discretion in the regional level [151], ecological compensations [22], the exclusion of make a decision nnounce efend practices [23], and distributional and procedural fairness in the siting course of action [240], and based on preliminary assessment of social economic losses and advantages [313]. In this study, we verify regardless of whether or not a neighborhood accepts the installation of a hypothetical wind farm in a rural area with a distinctive landscape and location identity worth, and discover the primary aspects that motivate such choices. We also CGS 12066 dimaleate Description estimate the monetary values of two (opposite) environmental externalities. The first issues the “Roniciclib Epigenetics Green-House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction”, along with the second is associated to “landscape protection”. Benefits associated with the former spring from a “global” environmental superior. Oppositely, benefits connected for the latter concern a “local” environmental good. To investigate attitudes and monetary preferences towards these two really distinctive environmental goods, we make use of the contingent valuation technique (CVM) [346]. In the survey, respondents in favor of wind farms were asked to state their willingness to spend for decreasing the impact of international warming by buying electricity developed by win.